I firmly believe that if more Thai citizens embraced the level of understanding and intellectual honesty demonstrated by veteran journalist Pravit Rojanaphruk and similarly minded historians, relations between Cambodia and Thailand would be far more peaceful, respectful and grounded in mutual recognition.
If broader Thai society were to adopt such perspectives — valuing historical truth, openness and critical reflection as these thinkers do — then misunderstandings rooted in the past would gradually diminish. In that scenario, both Cambodians and Thais could engage with one another not as rivals shaped by selective narratives, but as neighbours connected by shared history and mutual respect. True fraternity would become more achievable, and long-standing tensions would have a greater chance of being resolved through dialogue rather than division.
The historical relationship between our two nations is long, complex and deeply intertwined. During the era of the Khmer Empire, Khmer civilisation flourished and contributed significantly to the cultural and architectural legacy of the region. Its influence extended widely across mainland Southeast Asia, leaving enduring marks that are still visible today.
Later, the rise of the Ayutthaya Kingdom marked a shift in regional power. This period was characterised by both cultural exchange and military conflict, as neighbouring kingdoms interacted through trade, diplomacy and at times, confrontation.
These historical dynamics shaped the evolving identities of both nations.
It is important to recognise that our shared past includes both cooperation and conflict. Over centuries, borders shifted, cultures influenced one another and narratives developed differently on each side. This is precisely why history should be approached with honesty, balance and openness — rather than selective interpretation or denial.
In more recent times, disputes such as the one surrounding Preah Vihear Temple have demonstrated how historical interpretations can still influence modern relations. However, such issues also highlight the importance of dialogue, international law and respect for established legal decisions as tools for peaceful resolution.
Lasting peace cannot be achieved by ignoring history or holding onto narratives that deepen division. Instead, it requires a willingness to acknowledge the past as it is — shared, complex and at times painful — while choosing to move forward with mutual respect.
When people on both sides open their minds to this perspective, history becomes not a barrier, but a bridge. It allows neighbouring nations to understand each other more deeply and to build a future based on cooperation rather than conflict.
Cambodia and Thailand are not destined to remain divided by history. If understanding like that of Pravit Rojanaphruk and other thoughtful historians becomes more widely embraced across Thai society, then true reconciliation, stronger friendship and genuine regional harmony between our peoples can be achieved.
Tesh Chanthorn is a Cambodian citizen who longs for peace. The views and opinions expressed are his own.